Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 180051
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T14:31:01+00:00 2026-05-11T14:31:01+00:00

This is a significant edit from the original question, making it more concise and

  • 0

This is a significant edit from the original question, making it more concise and covering the points raised by existing answers…

Is it possible to have mulitple changes made to multiple tables, inside a single transaction, and rollback only some of the changes?

In the TSQL below, I would NOT want any of the changes made by ‘myLogSP’ to ever be rolled back. But all changes made by the various myBusinessSPs should rollback if necessary.

BEGIN TRANSACTION        EXEC myLogSP      EXEC @err = myBusinessSPa     IF (@err <> 0) BEGIN ROLLBACK TRANSACTION RETURN -1 END      EXEC myLogSP      EXEC @err = myBusinessSPb     IF (@err <> 0) BEGIN ROLLBACK TRANSACTION RETURN -1 END      EXEC myLogSP      EXEC @err = myBusinessSPc     IF (@err <> 0) BEGIN ROLLBACK TRANSACTION RETURN -1 END      EXEC myLogSP  COMMIT TRANSACTION RETURN 0 

The order is important, the myLogSPs must happen between and after the myBusinessSPs (the myLogSPs pick up on the changes made by the myBusinessSPs)

It is also important that all the myBusinessSPs happen inside one transaction to maintain database integrity, and allow all their changes to rollback if necessary.

It’s as if I want the myLogSPs to behave as if they’re not part of the transaction. It is just an inconvenient fact that they happen to be inside one (by virtue of needing to be called between the myBusinessSPs.)

EDIT:

Final answer is ‘no’, the only option is to redesign the code. Either to using table variables for the logging (as variables don’t get rolled back) or redesign the business logic to Not require Transactions…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T14:31:02+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:31 pm

    Use SAVEPOINTs, e.g.

    BEGIN TRANSACTION        EXEC myLogSP      SAVE TRANSACTION savepointA     EXEC @err = myBusinessSPa     IF (@err <> 0) BEGIN         ROLLBACK TRANSACTION savepointA         COMMIT         RETURN -1     END      EXEC myLogSP      SAVE TRANSACTION savepointB     EXEC @err = myBusinessSPb     IF (@err <> 0) BEGIN         ROLLBACK TRANSACTION savepointB         COMMIT         RETURN -1     END      EXEC myLogSP      SAVE TRANSACTION savepointC     EXEC @err = myBusinessSPc     IF (@err <> 0) BEGIN         ROLLBACK TRANSACTION savepointC         COMMIT         RETURN -1     END      EXEC myLogSP  COMMIT TRANSACTION 

    EDIT

    Based on the information provided so far (and my understanding of it) it appears that you will have to re-engineer you logging SPs, either to use variables, or to use files, or to allow them to run ‘after the fact’ as follows:

    BEGIN TRANSACTION        SAVE TRANSACTION savepointA     EXEC @err = myBusinessSPa     IF (@err <> 0) BEGIN         ROLLBACK TRANSACTION savepointA         EXEC myLogSPA -- the call to myBusinessSPa was attempted/failed         COMMIT         RETURN -1     END      SAVE TRANSACTION savepointB     EXEC @err = myBusinessSPb     IF (@err <> 0) BEGIN         ROLLBACK TRANSACTION savepointB         EXEC myLogSPA -- the call to myBusinessSPa originally succeeded         EXEC myLogSPB -- the call to myBusinessSPb was attempted/failed         COMMIT         RETURN -1     END      SAVE TRANSACTION savepointC     EXEC @err = myBusinessSPc     IF (@err <> 0) BEGIN         ROLLBACK TRANSACTION savepointC         EXEC myLogSPA -- the call to myBusinessSPa originally succeeded         EXEC myLogSPB -- the call to myBusinessSPb originally succeeded         EXEC myLogSPC -- the call to myBusinessSPc was attempted/failed         COMMIT         RETURN -1     END      EXEC myLogSPA -- the call to myBusinessSPa succeeded     EXEC myLogSPB -- the call to myBusinessSPb succeeded     EXEC myLogSPC -- the call to myBusinessSPc succeeded  COMMIT TRANSACTION 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 124k
  • Answers 124k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Are you running on OS 3.0? I saw the same… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It looks like you need to register Apache::Session::Memcached with Apache::Session::Wrapper,… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use DATENAME or DATEPART: SELECT DATENAME(dw,GETDATE()) -- Friday SELECT DATEPART(dw,GETDATE())… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am

Related Questions

I have a customer using the Access 97 runtime to support part of their
The answer to this question may turn out to be, Don't use typed DataSets
I have a class that handles events from a WinForms control. Based on what
I'm playing around with Django on my website hosting service. I found out that

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.