Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 692015
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T02:36:23+00:00 2026-05-14T02:36:23+00:00

This is admittedly a rather loose question. My current understanding of singletons is that

  • 0

This is admittedly a rather loose question. My current understanding of singletons is that they are a class that you set up in such a way that only one instance is ever created.

This sounds a lot like a static class to me. The main difference being that with a static class you don’t / can’t instance it, you just use it such as Math.pi(). With a singleton class, you would still need to do something like

singleton firstSingleton = new singleton();
firstSingleton.set_name("foo");

singleton secondSingleton = new singleton();

Correct me if i am wrong, but firstSingleton == secondSingleton right now, yes?

secondSingleston.set_name("bar");
firstSingleton.report_name(); // will output "bar" won't it?

Please note, I am asking this language independently, more about the concept. So I am not worried about actually how to code such a class, but more why you would wan’t to and what thing you would need to consider.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T02:36:23+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:36 am

    The main advantage of a singleton over a class consisting of statics is that you can later easily decide that you need in fact more than one instance, e.g. one per thread.

    However, in practice the main purpose of singletons is to make people feel less bad about having global variables.

    A practical example for a good use of a singleton: you have an app that uses an SQL database and you need a connection pool. The purpose of such a pool is to reuse DB connection, so you definitely want all clients to use the same pool. Thus, having it as a singleton is the correct design. But one day you need the app to connect to a second DB server, and realize that you cannot have connections to different servers in the same pool. Thus your “one instance overall” singleton becomes “one instance per DB server”.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Okay, Now admittedly this sounds like a silly question; But, I actually have a
This is a admittedly a bit of a terrible question, but my search results
This is admittedly an unusual question; I would never recommend replacing a boolean with
Base class looks like this (code comes from Django, but the question isn't Django
I tried asking this the other day, and admittedly did not phrase the question
This has been a rather problematic issue on numerous occasions. We have alot of
this is my code that I write it but I want to use LINQ
This is probably a stupid question, but how much of a security risk is
I've got an IQueryable repository (admittedly this is the first time I've tried this)
This question came into my mind while generating sample data for a SO-answer. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.