Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6956831
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T14:55:14+00:00 2026-05-27T14:55:14+00:00

This is an abstract from the Android docs regarding the targetSDKVersion attribute of the

  • 0

This is an abstract from the Android docs regarding the targetSDKVersion attribute of the uses-sdk element in the AndroiManifes.xml file.

With this attribute set, the application says that it is able to run
on older versions (down to minSdkVersion), but was explicitly tested
to work with the version specified here. Specifying this target
version allows the platform to disable compatibility settings that are
not required for the target version (which may otherwise be turned on
in order to maintain forward-compatibility) or enable newer features
that are not available to older applications.

Can anyone explain what forward-compatibility means in this context, or come up with examples of “compatibility settings” that can be disabled?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T14:55:14+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 2:55 pm

    This is mainly useful for stating that you support and adapting to big OS jumps, for example, you can design an app that can run from 1.6 to 3.2, without saying the target version is 11+, and it will work, but in API Version 11 and up, you will be runing in compatibility mode, where the tablet will ask you if you want to strech or zoom the app to fit to the screen.

    If you set target version to 11, the system will understand that you have actually done something to adapt to that API level, so you will not be presented the option to zoom or strech, instead it just uses it like it would if it were desinged only for 3.0+

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

From my understanding a .wsdl file consists of an xml specification. This abstract way
Consider this abstract class public abstract class Foo { public Injectable Prop {get;set;} }
I have a set of classes something like this: abstract class CollectionAbs implements Iterator
I have classes which are inherited from abstract Packet( this class has abstract method
Let's say I have some classes like this: abstract class View(val writer: XMLStreamWriter) {
According to the PHP manual , a class like this: abstract class Example {}
What's the best way to abstract this pattern: class MyClass attr_accessor :foo, :bar def
I frequently find myself creating classes which use this form (A): abstract class Animal
For example, let's say this is my abstract class: abstract class A{ int x;
This may be a bit of an abstract question, so apologies in advance. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.