Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8243039
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T21:22:28+00:00 2026-06-07T21:22:28+00:00

This is an implementation question. I have an array of tags which I need

  • 0

This is an implementation question.

I have an array of tags which I need to get data for each one. Each of the tags do not need to communicate with eachother. I want to get some data and store it somewhere.

Which is faster?

  • Ajax inside a for-loop
  • outside the for-loop
  • for-loop at the server side?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T21:22:31+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 9:22 pm

    In general, if you need to load a bunch of small data, its better to have one server endpoint that returns the all the data. It’s simpler for the client side and avoids the overhead of many xhrs. If you have 100 tags, do you really want to invoke 100 xhrs to get them all, not to mention coordinate the callbacks for all 100?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In relation to this question ( Efficient hashCode() implementation ) I have one more
This question may seem a little bit stackoverflow-implementation specific, but I have seen a
I have a question about efficient implementation. Lets say I have two arrays: One
I have a question regarding the native Array.forEach implementation of JavaScript: Does it behave
This is sort of a general implementation question. If I have an arbitrarily deep
I have a character array that contains serialized data that I need to interpret
A very basic question.. but I always do the bad implementation of this. I
While working on this question , I noticed that GCC (v4.7)'s implementation of std::function
I was writing an answer to this question when noticed that my simple implementation
Would you call this implementation of a multiton in objective-c 'elegant'? I have programmatically

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.