Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7071013
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T05:38:09+00:00 2026-05-28T05:38:09+00:00

This is getting little bit tricky. I am using state pattern in my application

  • 0

This is getting little bit tricky. I am using state pattern in my application to manage states. I want to have a single instance of each state in my application but I do not want to make each state class as a singleton class. The other approach that is coming to my mind is writing a StateLocator class. StateLocator can be singleton and it can hold instances of all the states. Please guide me on whether StateLocator looks to be a good solution or are there any other solutions where I will still be able to have only one instance of the state and can potentially avoid singletons.

Any help is appreciated. e.g.

public interface TestState {

    public void onTest();  
    public void onApprove()

}

class StateA implements TestState {  
    public void onTest() {  
    }  
    public void onApprove() {  
    }  
}  

class StateB implements TestState {  
    public void onTest() {  
    }  
    public void onApprove() {  
    }  
}   

class StateLocator {  

    private StateA mStateA;   
    private StateB mStateB;  

    StateLocator() {  
        mStateA = new StateA();  
        mStateB = new StateB();  
   }  

   public TestState getState(int stateType) {

      if(stateType == 1) {
          return mStateA;
      } else {
         return mStateB;
      }
  }  
}  
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T05:38:09+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 5:38 am

    StateLocator, in the way you are using it, is the “Registry” pattern

    http://martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/registry.html

    Knowing nothing about your design, this is a good way to avoid singletons. The registry could be a singleton ( doesn’t have to be necessarily ).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this little bit of code: using System; using System.Web.Mvc; public class SecureFilter
Thus far you guys have been wildly helpful with me getting this little ditty
I have this query which I want to run in my PHP application back
I've been thinking about getting a little bit greener with my computers and using
I have this application from the market in an apk format, but I want
I am a little bit lost. I am getting this JSON: [{ id: 210,
Anyone getting this error when using the new free chart controls MS bought from
I'm a little bit confused about how to approach this. I had never used
First a little bit of background: I have a REST service in WCF 4
First off, I'll admit I'm cargo-culting this a little bit -- my nice clean

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.