Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7551057
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T10:22:51+00:00 2026-05-30T10:22:51+00:00

This is just curiosity on my part, but what is more efficient, recursion or

  • 0

This is just curiosity on my part, but what is more efficient, recursion or a loop?

Given two functions (using common lisp):

(defun factorial_recursion (x)
    (if (> x 0)
        (* x (factorial_recursion (decf x)))
        1))

and

(defun factorial_loop (x)
    (loop for i from 1 to x for result = 1 then
        (* result i) finally
        (return result)))

Which is more efficient?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T10:22:52+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 10:22 am

    I don’t even have to read your code.

    Loop is more efficient for factorials. When you do recursion, you have up to x function calls on the stack.

    You almost never use recursion for performance reasons. You use recursion to make the problem more simple.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is just for curiosity. Exposé has two functions, among others, that rearrange windows
This is just a question to satisfy my curiosity. But to me it is
This is just a question out of curiosity but I am looking at a
This is just out of curiosity. We know that for cryptology applications two large
It's part curiosity and part because I was just trying to use this. If
This is just out of curiosity, but do any of you have an idea
This is just a curiosity question. I know that Spring can be used in
This is just to satisfy my own curiosity. Is there an implementation of this:
This is mostly just out of curiosity, and is potentially a silly question. :)
Just a general curiosity question. Why is this namespace System.Collections.Generic added by default in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.