This is more of a style question. I have a template file header.php in which I define a PrintHeader() function.
Callers of this function can specify, via global variables, the title of the page and any Javascript scripts to include when printing the header (because surely not every page will have the same title or want to include the same scripts). I chose to use global variables rather than function arguments because the latter would require the interface to change when adding new arguments.
Is this considered “good” style, and is there a “better” way to do what I’m trying to do?
header.php (simplified)
<?php
function PrintHeader()
{
global $pageTitle, $scripts; // Set by the caller of this function
echo <<<HEADER
<html>
<head>
<title>$pageTitle</title>
HEADER;
if( !empty($scripts) )
{
foreach($scripts as $script)
{
echo " <script type=\"text/javascript\" src=\"$script.js\"></script>\n";
}
}
echo " </head>\n";
}
?>
index.php (simplified)
<?php
$pageTitle = 'Welcome';
$scripts = array('script1', 'script2');
require('header.php');
PrintHeader();
// Print the rest of the page
?>
sure.
I see no point in defining and calling a function at all. as well as in using heredoc.
header.php (dramatically simplified):
index.php:
but still it’s not the best way, as it seems you’re not using a template where it most valuable – to output page contents itself.
So, I’d make it in three parts:
links.php (simplified):
where
main.tpl.phpis your main site template, including common parts, like header, footer, menu etc:and finally
links.tpl.phpis the actual page template:notice native HTML syntax, which is highlighted, readable and centralized in one place instead of being split between numerous functions and files
The point is in having separate template for the every PHP page as well as main site template for them all. With such setup you’ll get a lot of advantages such as custom error pages, multiple representations of the same data (say, HTML, JSON or XML) by switching only templates without changing the code and many more