Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 579855
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T14:24:37+00:00 2026-05-13T14:24:37+00:00

This is my code, SetOpacity get invoked with wrong values, why? function SetOpacity(eID, opacity){

  • 0

This is my code, SetOpacity get invoked with wrong values, why?

function SetOpacity(eID, opacity){                  
   eID.style.opacity = opacity / 100;
   eID.style.filter = 'alpha(opacity=' + opacity + ')';
}
function fade(eID, startOpacity, endOpacity){           
    var timer = 0;
    if (startOpacity < endOpacity) { 
       for (var i = startOpacity; i <= endOpacity; i++) {
           setTimeout(function() {SetOpacity(eID, i);}, timer * 30);
           timer++;
        }
    }           
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T14:24:37+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 2:24 pm

    This should work:

    for (var i = startOpacity; i <= endOpacity; i++) {
        (function(opacity) {
            setTimeout(function() {SetOpacity(eID, opacity);}, timer * 30);
        })(i);
        timer++;
    }
    

    This works as follows:

    • inside the loop you create an anonymous function (function(...){...}) and immediately call it with a parameter (that’s why there are parentheses around function(){}, so you can call it by adding () at the end and passing parameters)
    • parameters passed to this anonymous function (in this case i, which is opacity inside the function) are local to this anonymous function, so they don’t change during the next iterations of the loop, and you can safely pass them to another anonymous function (the first parameter in setTimeout)

    Your original version didn’t work because:

    • your function that is passed to setTimeout holds a reference to the variable i (not the value of it), and it resolves its value only when this function is called, which is not at the time of adding it to setTimeout
    • the value of this variable gets changed in the loop, and before even the first setTimeout executes, i will have reached endOpacity (the last value from the for loop)

    Unfortunately JavaScript only has function scope, so it won’t work if you create the variable inside the loop and assign a new actual value, because whenever there is some var inside a function, those variables are created at the time of function execution (and are undefined by default). The only (easy) way to create new scope is to create a function (which may be anonymous) and create new variables inside it (parameters are variables too).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 377k
  • Answers 377k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You're passing v8 by value to your find function. The… May 14, 2026 at 8:59 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Well you can make it simpler with object initializers, to… May 14, 2026 at 8:59 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The easiest way to do what you want is to… May 14, 2026 at 8:59 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.