Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6799483
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T18:51:14+00:00 2026-05-26T18:51:14+00:00

This is my code: // Start performance test clock assert((start=clock())!=-1); // Some reading and

  • 0

This is my code:

// Start performance test clock
assert((start=clock())!=-1);

// Some reading and writing methods

// Get stop time
stop = clock();

cout << stop << endl;

// Calculate operation time
double result = (double)(stop-start)/CLOCKS_PER_SEC;

// Print result
cout << "--> Finished analysing in " << result << "s" << endl;

It works great when I debug my program, but when I run the release version,
stop receives a much smaller value than start, and result is a negative number.

Any ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T18:51:14+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 6:51 pm

    The assignment of start should not be in the assert statement. assert is typically a no-op in release builds. So in the debug build, the statement start=clock() would be executed, but in the release build, it would not. So it is possible (depending on earlier code and the declaration of start) that it is not initialized. It is typically desirable to avoid using assert statements that have side effects; it can lead to subtle differences/bugs between debug and release builds.

    It might be better to write it like this:

    start = clock();
    assert(start != -1);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose code like this: class Base: def start(self): pass def stop(self) pass class A(Base):
I am trying to performance test some code. I am using a stopwatch. When
I found this via google: http://www.mvps.org/access/api/api0008.htm '******************** Code Start ************************** ' This code was
this code works fine until I start scrolling: - (UITableViewCell *)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView cellForRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath
when I run this code for the first time <?php session_start(); echo SID; ?>
I have been seeing code like this usually in the start of header files:
I'm using boost::asio, and I have code like this: void CServer::Start(int port) { tcp::acceptor
I'm writing some code that has to cascade delete records in a certain database,
I'd like to start by saying that my code is working perfectly, this is
I got following code: function test () { this.testFunction = function () { //code

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.