Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 203549
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T17:23:19+00:00 2026-05-11T17:23:19+00:00

This is rather infuriating. I’m trying to optimize a very large site, and I’m

  • 0

This is rather infuriating. I’m trying to optimize a very large site, and I’m at the step of reducing HTTP Requests. Microsoft is not cooperating. I have the following ScriptResources included. I’ll try and grab a top-line for each to distinguish them

  1. // Name: MicrosoftAjax.debug.js 53.5Kb
  2. // Name: MicrosoftAjaxWebForms.debug.js 14Kb
  3. AjaxControlToolkit.BoxSide = function() { 11.4Kb
  4. /// Sys.UI.DomElement 958 Bytes!
  5. // Sys.Timer 982 Bytes!
  6. // IDropSource 6.5Kb
  7. AjaxControlToolkit.FloatingBehavior = function(element) { 2.2Kb
  8. AjaxControlToolkit.BehaviorBase = function(element) { 5.4Kb
  9. AjaxControlToolkit.DynamicPopulateBehavior = function(element) { 2.9Kb
  10. AjaxControlToolkit.BoxCorners = function() { 3.6Kb
  11. AjaxControlToolkit.DropShadowBehavior = function(element) { 3.4Kb
  12. AjaxControlToolkit.ModalPopupBehavior = function(element) { 5.5Kb

Come on! 12 Bloody javascript includes! Less than a KILOBYTE! Half the time to get the dang data is probably spent asking for it! ARGHHH!

Anyway, as you can see, I am annoyed. Is there some way I can roll these up, and combine them? Like into one request?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T17:23:19+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:23 pm

    Just replace <asp:ScriptManager ... />
    with <ajaxToolkit:ToolkitScriptManager> ... />
    in your ASPX page and you’re
    done!

    http://blogs.msdn.com/delay/archive/2007/06/11/script-combining-made-easy-overview-of-the-ajax-control-toolkit-s-toolkitscriptmanager.aspx

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Know this might be rather basic, but I been trying to figure out how
I had posted this question on MSDN Forum http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/vsreportcontrols/thread/f00e3406-354d-4f54-acce-7b7f0ad4c90f But I am not getting
Please forgive this rather basic question, but I'm very new to Java and still
Let give you the details of this rather odd issue. We have a very
I set myself this rather simple sounding challenge but now I am stuck trying
Using PHP, and MySql, I am trying to implement this rather snazzy in-place editor
Found this rather strange bug in IE8; element.style.top is limited to 1342177 pixels. Even
I know this rather goes against the idea of enums, but is it possible
I've been having this rather frustrating problem, and having failed so many times, I'm
I always found this rather annoying fact about applets, that they disappear if you

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.