Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 418309
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T18:39:57+00:00 2026-05-12T18:39:57+00:00

This is rather interesting, I think. Consider following code, both the window.onload and body

  • 0

This is rather interesting, I think. Consider following code, both the window.onload and body onload=”” call the same function. However, the results are different. It appears to me that window.onload has a problem with collections. Here’s the code:

<html>
<script type="text/javascript">

    window.onload = getSpanElements();

    function getSpanElements(){
        var collectionBoolean = document.getElementsByTagName("span")?true:false;
        alert(
            "collection exists? " + collectionBoolean + "; number of collection members: " + document.getElementsByTagName("span").length
        );
    }


</script>
<head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
    <title>Untitled Document</title>
</head>
<body onload="getSpanElements()">
    <span> test </span>
</body>

As you can see, both report that the collection exists, however window.onload reports that it has no members. Any ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T18:39:58+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 6:39 pm

    You’re setting the function wrong:

    window.onload = getSpanElements();
    

    should be

    window.onload = getSpanElements;
    

    You’re setting the onload handler to the return value of getSpanElements() at the moment.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I think this question is rather easy for you shell scripting monsters. I am
Consider the following code in a class called Worker FileSystemWatcher watcher = new FileSystemWatcher();
So I'm working on a fun little program and ran across this rather interesting
I know this rather goes against the idea of enums, but is it possible
I searched google but couldn't find an answer to this rather simple question. I
I'd rather do this: say $shop->ShopperDueDate->andand->day_name(); vs. this: say $shop->ShopperDueDate->day_name() if $shop->ShopperDueDate; Any ideas?
(This is a question about the UI rather than the technology required to do
Rather than scraping a Ruby version of this algorithm off the net I wanted
Having recently discovered this method of development, I'm finding it a rather nice methodology.
Why do most C programmers name variables like this: int *myVariable; rather than like

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.