Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7967325
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T06:40:00+00:00 2026-06-04T06:40:00+00:00

This is really frustrating – I can build my native code from command line,

  • 0

This is really frustrating
– I can build my native code from command line, but when I build from eclipse(Sequoyah plug-in enabled) its simply through simple compilation errors like headers not found…
EVen when i build the library from command line everytime I try to run from eclipse it rebuuilds and there goes errors again
– I’m frustrated as I ran out of option to locate the issue
Can some one shed some light on this.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T06:40:01+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 6:40 am

    The error you are seeing is Unresolved inclusion with error markers at each header that Eclipse’s editor cannot find. This is confounding when you see it, because it is expected that after installing Sequoyah and the ADT, pointing the Sequoyah configuration to your NDK, that you’d have everything you need to start coding.

    Two things to observe. The process of building in the ADT “Android Perspective” will work until you click on one of your C/C++ files in your jni directory. Once you open one of these, you’ll see the error marker and the project will be tagged as containing errors.

    Second observation, when you convert the project to C/C++ perspective or to Sequoyah’s Android Native perspective (apparently there’s two ways to skin this cat), you will have the ability to configure the project settings around NDK toolchain, include paths, and builder settings. This is where you can set the ndk-build to automatically fire off on each change. And funny thing too is that the ndk-build will work fine until you click on one of your C/C++ sources.

    So solution, click [here] http://help.eclipse.org/galileo/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.cdt.doc.user/tasks/cdt_t_proj_paths.htm and you’ll get instructions for configuring the CDT’s include paths. You want to set your include paths for C/C++ (either, or both) so that you get to the platform folder includes.

    Example, I’ve got my project hello-jni-to-the-world project set to android-9. So configure the include path: android-ndk-r6b/platforms/android-9/arch-arm/usr/include . Now the magic won’t show up until you click apply/save and you’ll be prompted to rebuild the indexes.

    There are two to three other threads on Stackoverflow asking the same question, and I’ll have to find them and add them to the comments. Basically, there were no definitive answers and there’s a lot of the usual answering a question with a question: which version of NDK do you have, can you post your code, did you install java, is your computer on ?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This really seems like a bug to me, but perhaps some databinding gurus can
I have read that you can do it, but would this really improve performance
This is really frustrating, I can't and can't find how to create a form
This is REALLY frustrating! I have a common library of code I use across
This really shouldn't be hard, I just can't figure out how to do it.
This really puzzled for hours, I searched all over the internet, but got no
I've got this really simple piece of code that I thought was the correct
I'm in a need to optimize this really tiny, but pesky function. unsigned umod(int
I occasionally get this problem, and generally work around it, but it's rather frustrating.
This is really frustrating me. I'm new to C Sharp so looking for some

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.