This is similar case like JMS and JMS provider? Or can I use JMX without application server and JMX provider?
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
This is similar case like JMS and JMS provider? Or can I use JMX without application server and JMX provider?
Absolutely. JMX is part of the standard JavaSE6 API. Every Java5+ VM has an embedded JMX server.
JavaEE appservers typically make heavy use of JMX, but it’s by no means limited to them.
The comparison with JMS only goes so far – yes, there is a separation between interface and implementation, and yes, different implementations have proprietary network protocols to access them remotely, but JMX is an awful lot simpler than JMS.