Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6971907
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T16:54:00+00:00 2026-05-27T16:54:00+00:00

This is something I would need to do to create a flexible logic structure

  • 0

This is something I would need to do to create a flexible logic structure that I need for a class.

The class is like this:

public class myclass {
  public Action myaction;
  public int actionparams;
  public string label;

  public void myactionfunction() {
    //do void parameter action
  }

  public void myactionfunction(int myparam) {
    //do one parameter action
  }

  public void myactionfunction(int myparam, int myparam2) {
    //do two parameter action
  }
}

Well the problem I’m facing is that I will use this class where ‘myaction’ can arbitrarily require none or as much as six parameters. Since ‘Action’ needs to be defined for each parameter it’s meant to support, I could certainly define as much ‘myactions’ that I expect parameters for, but that would not be ideal, since I’d need to hardwire parameter types there.

I am hoping that there’s a way in which I could ‘simply’ reassign myaction’s type, so that in some manner I can do something like

myaction.type = Action<string,int,int>; //i know this looks bad, but should give the idea

I have read about delegate declarations, but can’t figure if there’s a way to use them for my purpose.

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T16:54:00+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 4:54 pm

    No, you can’t. You can, however, use a capture such that everything is Action, i.e.:

    public void myactionfunction() {
        myaction = () => DoSomethingWithoutParameters();
    }
    
    public void myactionfunction(int myparam) {
        myaction = () => DoSomethingWithOneParameter(myparam);
    }
    
    public void myactionfunction(int myparam, int myparam2) {
        myaction = () => DoSomethingWithTwoParameters(myparam, myparam2);
    }
    

    if these actually represent default values, then use default values!

    public void SomeMethod(int x = 123, int y = 456) {
        myaction = () => Foo(x, y);
    }
    

    which can be called via any of:

    SomeMethod();
    SomeMethod(1);
    SomeMethod(1, 2);
    SomeMethod(x: 1);
    SomeMethod(y: 2);
    SomeMethod(x: 1, y: 2);
    SomeMethod(y: 2, x: 1);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What I need is something like this: /<[\w\d]+ ([\w\d]+\=[w\d])+\/>/ Something that would match several
This is something that I think would be very useful. Basically, I'd like there
This is something that I solved using reflection, but would like to see how
Is there any reason something like this would not work? This is the logic
In PHP, to create a new object you would do something like this, $dog
I would try something like this but it isn't allowed. function GetDynamicModulesProperties() { var
I would like to do something like this: a rotating cube on a form.
I would like to do something like this: container::iterator it = NULL; switch (
Suppose a tree structure is implemented in SQL like this: CREATE TABLE nodes (
for example i'd need to create something like google search query parser to parse

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.