Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7524721
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T03:08:29+00:00 2026-05-30T03:08:29+00:00

This is the second time I’ve implemented something like this and I suspect there

  • 0

This is the second time I’ve implemented something like this and I suspect there has to be a better (read: more pythonic) way to do this:

phone_book = {}

def add_number(name,number):
  if name in phone_book:
    phone_book['name'].append(number)
  else:
    phone_book['name'] = [number]

I realize the code can likely be made more concise with conditional assignments, but I suspect there’s likely a better way to go about this. I’m not interested in only making the code shorter.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T03:08:30+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 3:08 am

    Use dict‘s setdefault like this:

    phone_book.setdefault('name', []).append(number)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Ok, I need something like this: datediff(second, date_one, date_two) < 1 dates are stored
This is the second time this has happened to me now. I changed the
This is second consecutive time that apple has rejected my application citing the following
This is the second time this has happened to me, and I don't know
Has anyone else ever ran across this? This is the second time it's come
I've a application that must work after another application. This second application has a
As mentioned in this answer simply calling the destructor for the second time is
Perhaps this question is trivial, but thinking a second time about it I wonder
The exception is thrown in line 24 the second time I type something (after
this is my second time using ORACLE xe and Apex. Here is what I'm

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.