Home/ Questions/Q 171321
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-11T12:58:02+00:00

This looks like it should be possible with the following: .verticalText { /* IE-only

  • 0

This looks like it should be possible with the following:

.verticalText  {                /* IE-only DX filter */     writing-mode: tb-rl;     filter: flipv fliph;      /* Safari/Chrome function */     -webkit-transform: rotate(270deg);      /* works in latest FX builds */     -moz-transform: rotate(270deg); }

This works in IE.

It goes wrong in a bizarre way in Safari, Chrome and FX – the cell’s size is calculated before the text is rotated!

screenshot of bug

Here is a demo: http://jsfiddle.net/HSKws/

I’m using dynamic images as a workaround, although that also has its problems. I’m happy with that as a fall-back, but it seems like there should be a way to make this CSS work – it’s almost there.

Anyone know a way to make the cells fit the content after the transform has been applied?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. ‘transform’ alters the orientation of the entire element you declare it on, not the text content inside it. It’s more like IE’s ‘matrix’ property than ‘writing-mode’.

    Crucially, transforming an element doesn’t change how its content size is calculated (or how its parent’s layout is affected by that size). CSS’s algorithms for vertical and horizontal sizing are different and difficult enough to get right to being with; there’s no real consistent way they could accomodate content with arbitrary rotation. So ‘transform’ is like using ‘position: relative’: it changes where the content is rendered, but not anything to do with layout size.

    So if you want to include one in a table you’ll need to set the cell’s ‘height’ explicitly to accomodate the expected rotated ‘width’. If you don’t know that in advance you could potentially hack it up with JavaScript, perhaps.

    FWIW: for me on Fx3.1b3 the span is also rotated like the others. However on Windows with its horizontal-only anti-aliasing (ClearType) the rendering doesn’t look great… a well-rendered image could come out considerably better.

    • 0