Home/ Questions/Q 3396528
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-18T04:25:08+00:00

This may be a stupid question, but here goes. I’ve seen several projects using

  • 0

This may be a stupid question, but here goes.

I’ve seen several projects using some translation library (e.g. gettext) working with plain english placeholders. So for example:

_("Please enter your name");

instead of abstract placeholders (which has always been my instinctive preference)

_("error_please_enter_name");

I have seen various recommendations on SO to work with the former method, but I don’t understand why. What I don’t get is what do you do if you need to change the english wording? Because if the actual text is used as the key for all existing translations, you would have to edit all the translations, too, and change each key. Or don’t you?

Isn’t that awfully cumbersome? Why is this the industry standard?

It’s definitely not proper normalization to do it this way. Are there massive advantages to this method that I’m not seeing?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Yes, you have to alter the existing translation files, and that is a good thing.

    If you change the English wording, the translations probably need to change, too. Even if they don’t, you need someone who speaks the other language to check.

    You prep a new version, and part of the QA process is checking the translations. If the English wording changed and nobody checked the translation, it’ll stick out like a sore thumb and it’ll get fixed.

    • 0