Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8805763
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T01:56:57+00:00 2026-06-14T01:56:57+00:00

This may be a very basic oversight on my part, but I can’t seem

  • 0

This may be a very basic oversight on my part, but I can’t seem to recall a simple method for removing an association between two objects joined via has_many :through. IE:

class Photo
  has_many :tags, :through => :taggings
  has_many :taggings, :dependent => :destroy
end

class Tags
  has_many :photos, :through => :taggings
  has_many :taggings, :dependent => :destroy
end

class Taggings
  belongs_to :photo
  belongs_to :tag
end

If you have two objects, tag and photo, you can associate them just by doing this:

photo.tags << tag

So, is there an equally simple opposite to this? ie:

photo.tags.remove tag
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T01:56:58+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 1:56 am

    here’s what you want:

    photo.tags.delete(tag)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This may be very basic, but I just can`t figure out what to do,
This may seem like a very basic question, well, it is, but I am
This may seem like a very basic question, but its been in my head
This may seem like a very basic question but I did not seem to
this may seem like a very basic question, but i have difficulty grasping it,
This may be very basic, but I've done a lot of Googling and can't
This may be very simple question,But please help me. i wanted to know what
this may be a very simple question, but is it possible to force a
This may seem a very silly question. Consider this: I have a simple Boolean
This may seem to be an academic question, but still I would be very

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.