Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4272172
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T07:32:31+00:00 2026-05-21T07:32:31+00:00

This may be an obvious question, but I think there may well be multiple

  • 0

This may be an obvious question, but I think there may well be multiple ways to implement it, so not only will this be useful to me, hopefully it will be useful to others.

Essentially I’m looking for the best way to implement a list view that can accept different types of objects and then renders them with the appropriate item/data template for that object.

So for example… we have a standard product list view, and when we view different categories the business has decided it would like to show a different item template style for each different category.

The main reason for asking this here, is to avoid a nasty hacky solution and discover a good clean method instead.

Hopefully I’ve provided enough information, let me know if you need more.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T07:32:31+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 7:32 am

    Just specifying DataTemplates in the Resources with the respective DataType is enough, e.g.

    <ListView ItemsSource="{Binding Data}">
        <ListView.Resources>
            <!-- Do NOT set the x:Key -->
            <DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type local:Employee}">
                <TextBlock Text="{Binding Name}" Foreground="Blue"/>
            </DataTemplate>
            <DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type local:Machine}">
                <TextBlock Text="{Binding Model}" Foreground="Red"/>
            </DataTemplate>
        </ListView.Resources>
    </ListView>
    

    Screenshot

    (Note that DataTemplate.DataType can also be used for implicit XML data templating (see docs), the property type for that reason is not System.Type, so unlike in Style.TargetType you have to use x:Type to reference a CLR-type. If you just enter a string it will not be converted to a type.)

    You might also want to look into CompositeCollections, to get clean merged lists of varying types.


    Sample data i used:

    ObservableCollection<Employee> data = new ObservableCollection<Employee>(new Employee[]
    {
        new Employee("Hans", "Programmer")      ,
        new Employee("Elister", "Programmer")   ,
        new Employee("Steve", "GUI Designer")   ,
        new Employee("Stephen", "GUI Designer") ,
        new Employee("Joe", "Coffee Getter")    ,
        new Employee("Julien", "Programmer")    ,
        new Employee("John", "Coffee Getter")   ,
    });
    ObservableCollection<Machine> data2 = new ObservableCollection<Machine>(new Machine[]
    {
        new Machine("XI2",    String.Empty),
        new Machine("MK2-xx", String.Empty),
        new Machine("A2-B16", String.Empty),
    });
    CompositeCollection cc1 = new CompositeCollection();
    cc1.Add(new CollectionContainer() { Collection = data });
    cc1.Add(new CollectionContainer() { Collection = data2 });
    Data = cc1;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This may seem like an obvious (or not so obvious) question, but let me
This seems like an obvious question but there does not appear to be an
The answer to this question may be obvious but I need to ask it
This may be a basic question, but I could not find an answer for
This question may be easy and the answer obvious, but I can't seem to
This may be an obvious question but im new to ruby and I've spent
This may be a silly question with an obvious answer, but I've pondered it
I am a newbie to C++, and this question may seem obvious to a
i'm a long-time newbie to c#, and this question may be too obvious, so
I may be missing something obvious here, but how could I rewrite this code

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.