Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8451115
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T11:09:01+00:00 2026-06-10T11:09:01+00:00

This may be overkill, but I am trying to reduce the network consumption of

  • 0

This may be overkill, but I am trying to reduce the network consumption of a client/server protocol, by having both sides keep copies of previously transferred URIs, so as to use 2-4 byte placeholders instead of the full URIs on subsequent chatter.

Problem is I think it will be quite expensive to reflect through all the complex objects being transferred to locate the URIs that need processing, whereas the serializer is already visiting all these fields and probably using a mechanism much faster than reflection.

Can this be done in protobuf-net?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T11:09:03+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 11:09 am

    If this is part of a single call to Serialize/Deserialize (i.e. your data has the same uri repeated at multiple locations), then you can already do this, simply by telling it to treat those strings as references (it has special handling of strings, so two different references of the same string contents count as equal):

    [ProtoMember(7, AsReference=true)]
    public string Uri {get;set;}
    

    During serialization, the first time it spots a new string value (decorated with AsReference=true) it will generate a unique token to represent the string; all subsequent usages of that same string will serialize only the token.

    If this is in separate calls to Serialize/Deserialize, then no: you would have to do it manually. I can think of some ways of doing it, but I think this would be better handled outside of the serialization layer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This may be a stupid question, but I'm trying to replicate a customer's OpenLDAP
This may be a stupid question but I have a code with the following
This may be have a better name than custom tab completion, but here's the
This may be the wrong place but this is new to me. I did
This may be a simple question but I can;t find the answer anywhere. Here
This may sound like a very generic question but here it goes. I have
this may sound pretty straight forward, but still I want to post this question
This may seem a bit crazy, but if you can tell me a better
This may be a simple fix and maybe I'm missing something obvious, but when
This question relates to Java collections - specifically Hashtable and Vector - but may

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.