Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 800987
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T23:22:27+00:00 2026-05-14T23:22:27+00:00

This may be very obvious question, pardon me if so. I have below code

  • 0

This may be very obvious question, pardon me if so.

I have below code snippet out of my project,

#include <stdio.h>
class X
{
  public:
   int i;
   X() : i(0) {};
};

int main(int argc,char *arv[])
{
  X *ptr = new X[10];
  unsigned index = 5;
  cout<<ptr[index].i<<endl;
  return 0;
}

Question
Can I change the meaning of the ptr[index] ? Because I need to return the value of ptr[a[index]] where a is an array for subindexing. I do not want to modify existing source code. Any new function added which can change the behavior is needed.

Since the access to index operator is in too many places (536 to be precise) in my code, and has complex formulas inside the index subscript operator, I am not inclined to change the code in many locations.


PS :
1. I tried operator overload and came to conclusion that it is not possible.
2. Also p[i] will be transformed into *(p+i). I cannot redefine the basic operator ‘+’.

So just want to reconfirm my understanding and if there are any possible short-cuts to achieve.
Else I need fix it by royal method of changing every line of code 🙂 .

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T23:22:28+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 11:22 pm

    As Alex says, your ‘subindexing’ usage of [] would be totally nonobvious for anyone reading your code.

    That said, you can define a class such as this:

    template<class T>
    class SubindexingList {
        vector<T> data;
        vector<int> subindexes;
    public:
        SubindexingList(int count) : data(count) { }
        void set_subindexes(vector<T> const& newval) { subindexes = newval; }
        T& operator[](int index) { return data[subindexes[index]]; }
        T const& operator[](int index) const { return data[subindexes[index]]; }
    };
    

    And replace your X *ptr = new X[10]; with SubindexingList<X> stuff(10);.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This may be a very noobie question, but in today's world of web app
This may be an unusual question, but are there any resources people have come
This question is specific to Erlang, but may have general implications to other IO
This may be a very simple problem, but I couldn't find an answer googleing
This may seem like a daft question, but i was wondering about how to
This may seem like a programming 101 question and I had thought I knew
This may be a doozy, but does anyone have an idea how to: Pass
This may seem like a basic/stupid/obviously-answered question, but I wanted to check: why use
This may be a no-brainer for the WPF cognoscenti, but I'd like to know
This may be simple one, but 5 mins of Googling didn't give me the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.