Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3758982
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T10:14:45+00:00 2026-05-19T10:14:45+00:00

This may seem a little much, but this is picking at me! Envision a

  • 0

This may seem a little “much”, but this is picking at me!

Envision a form with a CheckBoxList that acts as an inclusive filter for a user.

This user fills out a form, checks off which items in the filter they want, and off they go.

I’m looking for a concise way to write the following LINQ statement:

If NO items are checked, show all results
else
Show results filtered by user selection

Is it possible (and if so, how) to write this without using a conditional statement that basically is the same query, but without the Contains method?

I tried putting a ternary operator in my Where clause, but the compiler didn’t like it at all.

System.Collections.Generic.List catIds = new System.Collections.Generic.List();

              foreach (ListItem lstItemCategory in lstCategories.Items)
              {
                  if (lstItemCategory.Selected)
                  {
                      catIds.Add(Convert.ToInt64(lstItemCategory.Value));
                  }
              }

              var qry = from rategroup in rategroups
                        from rate in rategroup.Rates
                        orderby rate.RateClass.Id descending
                        select new
                        {
                            Category = rate.Product.ProductCategories[0].Category.Description,
                            rate.Product.Description,
                            Carrier = rate.CarrierName,
                            Id = rate.Product.ProductCategories[0].Id
                        };


              this.gvSchedule.DataSource = qry.Where(x => catIds.Contains(x.Id)).OrderBy(x => x.Category).ThenBy(x => x.Carrier).ToArray();
              this.gvSchedule.DataBind();
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T10:14:46+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 10:14 am

    Why not just do:

    var filteredQry = catIds.Any() ? qry.Where(x => catIds.Contains(x.Id)) : qry;
    this.gvSchedule.DataSource = filteredQry.OrderBy(x => x.Category)
                                            .ThenBy(x => x.Carrier)
                                            .ToArray();
    

    Or:

    if(catIds.Any())
        qry = qry.Where(x => catIds.Contains(x.Id));
    
    this.gvSchedule.DataSource = qry.OrderBy(x => x.Category)
                                    .ThenBy(x => x.Carrier)
                                    .ToArray();
    

    You could also try using an Expression<Func<Foo, bool>> filter and assigning it to an ‘always true’ predicate or the genuine filter depending on the condition, but this will be slightly difficult since an anonymous type is involved.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This question may seem a little bit stackoverflow-implementation specific, but I have seen a
This may seem a little upside down faced, but what I want to be
this may seem a little odd, but it would make for a convenient way
This may seem a bit crazy, but if you can tell me a better
This may seem like a nit-picky detail, but I am wanting to disable to
this may seem like a simple problem but I couldn't find it in the
This may seem like a no-brainier, but the thing is I wont know the
This may seem stupid, but I can't see the events list on the Debug
This may seem like a simple question but i am getting an error when
This may seem really silly to you, I admit, but when discussing the Model-View-ViewModel

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.