Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8272037
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T07:00:31+00:00 2026-06-08T07:00:31+00:00

This may seem an odd thing to want to do but ignoring that, is

  • 0

This may seem an odd thing to want to do but ignoring that, is there a nice concise way of converting a List<string> to Dictionary<string, string> where each Key Value Pair in the Dictionary is just each string in the List. i.e.

List = string1, string2, string3
Dictionary = string1/string1, string2/string2, string3/string3

I have done plenty of searching and there are literally dozens of examples on Stackoverflow alone of doing it in the opposite direction but not this way round.

The reason for doing this is I have two third part components and changing them is out of my hands. One returns a list of email addresses as a List<string> and the other send emails where the To parameter is a Dictionary<string, string>. The key of the dictionary is the email address and the value is their real name. However, I don’t know the real name but it still works if you set the real name to the email address as well. Therefore why I want to convert a List to a Dictionary<string, string>. There are plenty of ways of doing this. A foreach loop on the list which adds a kvp to a dictionary. But I like terse code and wondered if there was a single line solution.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T07:00:32+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 7:00 am

    Try this:

    var res = list.ToDictionary(x => x, x => x);
    

    The first lambda lets you pick the key, the second one picks the value.

    You can play with it and make values differ from the keys, like this:

    var res = list.ToDictionary(x => x, x => string.Format("Val: {0}", x));
    

    If your list contains duplicates, add Distinct() like this:

    var res = list.Distinct().ToDictionary(x => x, x => x);
    

    EDIT To comment on the valid reason, I think the only reason that could be valid for conversions like this is that at some point the keys and the values in the resultant dictionary are going to diverge. For example, you would do an initial conversion, and then replace some of the values with something else. If the keys and the values are always going to be the same, HashSet<String> would provide a much better fit for your situation:

    var res = new HashSet<string>(list);
    if (res.Contains("string1")) ...
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

this may seem a little odd, but it would make for a convenient way
this may seem odd, but I actually need a PHP script that WILL time-out,
This may seem like an odd one, but I want to be able to
This may seem like an odd thing to ask, but it'd take me forever
this may seem basic but Is there a way to create a batch to
This may seem like an odd question but I was talking to a friend
This may seem like a no-brainier, but the thing is I wont know the
This may seem stupid, but I can't see the events list on the Debug
This may seem a bit odd, but I really need to create a workaround
I am still learning SQL so this may seem a very odd question, but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.