Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6162985
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T21:44:58+00:00 2026-05-23T21:44:58+00:00

This method i am using for concurrent downloads. public void DownloadConcurrent(Action Method) { Action[]

  • 0

This method i am using for concurrent downloads.

public void DownloadConcurrent(Action Method)
        {
            Action[] methodList = new Action[Concurent_Downloads];

            for (int i = 0; i < Concurent_Downloads; i++)
            {
                methodList[i] = Method;
            }

            Parallel.Invoke(methodList);
        }

I am trying to download urls simultaneously, but the No. of active downloads is always one.

like all the downloads will invoke, but only one url will start downloading data, not like all will start progressing the downloads.

I want all downloads to work parallel same time, unable to achieve that.

Update: the methord is using a Queue, it is downloading diffrent urls, form the queue.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T21:45:00+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 9:45 pm

    Instance members of a WebClient are not thread safe, so ensure that you have a separate instances in each action. In the method you have shown you seem to be multiplicating the same action delegate multiple times. So you are not downloading different urls, you are downloading the same url multiple times. And because the WebClient is not thread safe you might run into problems.

    Here’s an example of parallel downloads of multiple urls using the TPL:

    using System;
    using System.Linq;
    using System.Net;
    using System.Threading.Tasks;
    
    class Program
    {
        static void Main()
        {
            var urls = new[] 
            { 
                "http://google.com", 
                "http://yahoo.com", 
                "http://stackoverflow.com" 
            };
    
            var tasks = urls
                .Select(url => Task.Factory.StartNew(
                    state => 
                    {
                        using (var client = new WebClient())
                        {
                            var u = (string)state;
                            Console.WriteLine("starting to download {0}", u);
                            string result = client.DownloadString(u);
                            Console.WriteLine("finished downloading {0}", u);
                        }
                    }, url)
                )
                .ToArray();
    
            Task.WaitAll(tasks);
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I call function in .NET using Reflection (Method.Invoke). If an error occurs inside this
Should I be using this method of throwing errors: if (isset($this->dbfields[$var])) { return $this->dbfields[$var];
Currently i have this method: static boolean checkDecimalPlaces(double d, int decimalPlaces){ if (d==0) return
I have this method in my db class public function query($queryString) { if (!$this->_connected)
All, I am trying to cancel two concurrent HttpWebRequests using a method similar to
I need a method of stopping concurrent logins using PHP/MySQL. The current setup Currently
I'm using this method to copy a file: [fileManager copyItemAtPath:sourcePath toPath:targetPath error:&error]; I want
I am working with a method using LINQ to XML to return a string.This
With C# 3.0, I know you can extend methods using the 'this' nomenclature. I'm
This question is about using getter methods of a singleton object in worker threads.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.