Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9084233
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 16, 20262026-06-16T20:57:08+00:00 2026-06-16T20:57:08+00:00

This must be really obvious, but I can’t spot the answer. I need to

  • 0

This must be really obvious, but I can’t spot the answer. I need to put a lock around a variable to ensure that a couple of race-hazard conditions are avoided. From what I can see, a pretty simple solution exists using Lock, according to the android docs:

Lock l = ...;
l.lock();
try {
    // access the resource protected by this lock
 }
 finally {
     l.unlock();
 }

So far, so good. However, I can’t make the first line work. It would seem that something like:

Lock l = new Lock();

Might be correct, but eclipse reports, “Cannot instantiate the type Lock” – and no more.

Any suggestions?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-16T20:57:09+00:00Added an answer on June 16, 2026 at 8:57 pm

    If you’re very keen on using a Lock, you need to choose a Lock implementation as you cannot instantiate interfaces.
    As per the docs
    You have 3 choices:

    • ReentrantLock
    • Condition This isn’t a Lock itself but rather a helper class since Conditions are bound to Locks.
    • ReadWriteLock

    You’re probably looking for the ReentrantLock possibly with some Conditions

    This means that instead of Lock l = new Lock(); you would do:

    ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();
    

    However, if all you’re needing to lock is a small part, a synchronized block/method is cleaner (as suggested by @Leonidos & @assylias).

    If you have a method that sets the value, you can do:

    public synchronized void setValue (var newValue)
    {
      value = newValue;
    }
    

    or if this is a part of a larger method:

    public void doInfinite ()
    {
      //code
      synchronized (this)
      { 
        value = aValue;
      }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This must be really obvious, but how do I make a winsock listen to
I know there must be a really simple answer to this question, but I
I must be missing something really obvious here, but I can't seem to figure
I know SQL well but I must be missing something really dumb here. This
This must have an obvious solution, but I'm stumped. We are developing an application
This must be very simple. But I just can't seem to find the proper
This should be really simple but for some reason I can't seem to get
I think this must be a FAQ, but googling hasn't really helped. What may
I should be sleeping but this is really bugging me. I can't get a
It must be obvious, but I can't figure it out. I spent almost a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.