Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8073009
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T14:12:11+00:00 2026-06-05T14:12:11+00:00

This Question based on this question: How to dispose the local variable that contains

  • 0

This Question based on this question:
How to dispose the local variable that contains event

Someone said:one event handler to an instance,the reference count of the instance will added? why?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T14:12:13+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 2:12 pm

    Your linked question, as Jon Skeet states, has it backwards. The only thing keeping watcher alive is perhaps its own internal implementation where it may (or may not) register an event with a lower-level object that is responsible for feeding back “ticks”. -but this is just conjecture.

    Clicking the button twice will yield two separate watcher instances, each with one subscriber to the PositionChanged event (which just happens to be the same method on the same instance).

    Importantly, it isn’t the PositionChanged subscriber that is keeping watcher alive after the method quits – it is something else (I suspect buried within the GeoCoordinateWatcher implementation). When the method exits, a reference to a particular instance of watcher is correctly popped off the stack, but due to another reference being held on watcher the effective reference count in the eyes of the CLR is still greater than zero – therefore, not eligible for garbage collection.

    Because of this, it will continue on to fire the PositionChanged event. As nothing in the event stops the watcher from continuing, I’m going to guess you may have a memory leak because each button click will create and leave alive a watcher instance.

    You either need to store and use only one GeoCoordinateWatcher class, or close-off / dispose / stop it each time you handle the event.


    The usual consideration with events and subscriptions is being mindful of short-lived objects subscribing to long-lived objects.

    Delegates hold references to a particular method in a particular instance of a class (or just the type itself if it were a static method). Subscribing to an event causes the event publisher to inadvertently hold a reference to the subscriber instance via the subscription’s delegate.

    Obviously, if you register a static method as an event handler, you won’t get this reference count because there is no instance.

    A memory leak can occur if the subscriber is short-lived and the event publisher is long-lived, if you don’t unsubscribe. Assume the subscriber would like to be eligible for GC, because it has an active subscription against an event somewhere and that object still lives, it cannot be eligible until it is removed from that subscription list.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This question is based on a side-effect of that one . My .py files
This question is based on a previous , but that's just FYI. I've managed
This question is based on Async.TryCancelled doesn't work with Async.RunSynchronously that looks complex, so
UPDATE (2010-12-21): Completely rewrote this question based on tests that I've been doing. Also,
This question is based on the thread . I have the shell function function
This question is based on this thread . Is [---] a comment in Git
This question is based on this thread . I am interested in how Git
This question is based on this thread . The code function man() { man
This question is based on this thread in Meta . I would like to
This question is based on this thread . Problem: to access MySQL's manual when

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.