Question

This question comes after solving the problem I got in this question. I have a c++ code that processes frames from a camera and generates a matrix for each processed frame. I want to send to matlab engine each matrix, so at the end of the execution I have in stored all the matrices.
I am conffused about how to do this, I send a matrix in each iteration but it is overwritting it all the time, so at the end I only have one. Here is a code example:

matrix.cpp

#include helper.h

mxArray *mat;   
mat = mxCreateDoubleMatrix(13, 13, mxREAL);     
memcpy(mxGetPr(mat),matrix.data, 13*13*sizeof(double));
engPutVariable(engine, "mat", mat);

I also tried to use a counter to dinamically name the different matrices, but it didn’t work as matlab engine requires the variables to be defined first. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks.

Answer 1

If you don’t know the number of frames a priori, don’t try to expand the mxArray in C. It is not convenient. You were already close to start. All your problems can be solved with:

engEvalString(engine, "your command here")

Read more here.

The simplest approach is something like:

engPutVariable(engine, "mat", mat);
engEvalString("frames{length(frames)+1} = mat;");

Don’t do it exactly that, it is an illustration and will be very slow. Much better to preallocate, say 1000 frames then expand it another 1000 (or a more appropriate number) when needed. Even better is to not use cell arrays which are slow. Instead you could use a 3D array, such as:

frames = zeros(13,13,1000);
frames(:,:,i) = mat;
i = i + 1;

Again, preallocate in blocks. You get the idea. If you really need to be fast, you could build the 3D arrays in C and ship them to MATLAB when they fill.