Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8685883
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T22:41:28+00:00 2026-06-12T22:41:28+00:00

This question has probably been asked a dozen times on Stack Overflow (e.g. (

  • 0

This question has probably been asked a dozen times on Stack Overflow (e.g. (1), (2), (3), (4), (5)) but every time the answer seems to be different and none of them have helped me. I’m working on a Rails Engine and I’m finding that Rspec2 gets route errors, but I can reach the routes in the browser. Here’s the situation:

  • In the engine’s routes.rb:

    resources :mw_interactives, :controller => 'mw_interactives', :constraints => { :id => /\d+/ }, :except => :show
    
    # This is so we can build the InteractiveItem at the same time as the Interactive
    resources :pages, :controller => 'interactive_pages', :constraints => { :id => /\d+/ }, :only => [:show] do
      resources :mw_interactives, :controller => 'mw_interactives', :constraints => { :id => /\d+/ }, :except => :show
    end
    
  • Excerpted output of rake routes:

         new_mw_interactive GET    /mw_interactives/new(.:format)                              lightweight/mw_interactives#new {:id=>/\d+/}
                            ...
    new_page_mw_interactive GET    /pages/:page_id/mw_interactives/new(.:format)               lightweight/mw_interactives#new {:id=>/\d+/, :page_id=>/\d+/}
    
  • And my test, from one of the controller specs (describe Lightweight::MwInteractivesController do):

    it 'shows a form for a new interactive' do
      get :new
    end
    

…which gets this result:

Failure/Error: get :new
ActionController::RoutingError:
  No route matches {:controller=>"lightweight/mw_interactives", :action=>"new"}

…and yet when I go to that route in the browser, it works exactly as intended.

What am I missing here?

ETA: To clarify a point Andreas raises: this is a Rails Engine, so rspec runs in a dummy application which includes the engine’s routes in a namespace:

 mount Lightweight::Engine => "/lightweight"

…so the routes shown in rake routes are prefaced with /lightweight/. That’s why the route shown in the Rspec error doesn’t seem to match what’s in rake routes. But it does make the debugging an extra step wonkier.

ETA2: Answering Ryan Clark’s comment, this is the action I’m testing:

 module Lightweight
   class MwInteractivesController < ApplicationController
     def new
       create
     end

…and that’s it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T22:41:30+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 10:41 pm

    I found a workaround for this. Right at the top of the spec, I added this code:

    render_views
    before do
      # work around bug in routing testing
      @routes = Lightweight::Engine.routes
    end
    

    …and now the spec runs without the routing error. But I don’t know why this works, so if someone can post an answer which explains it, I’ll accept that.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I realize this question has probably been asked numerous times, but I have not
I know this question has probably been asked so many times here, but I
this question has probably been asked before, but i'm stuck and i've tried a
I realise that this question has probably been asked to death, but none of
Sorry I know this question has probably been asked before, but do you know
I feel like this question has probably been asked a thousand times already, so
I realize this question has been asked several times, but I wanted to frame
This is probably a question that has been asked before, but I couldn't find
You're probably thinking this has been asked a million times before but I think
This question has probably already been answered somewhere but I'm having a hard time

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.