Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6970389
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T16:42:14+00:00 2026-05-27T16:42:14+00:00

This question is not about the cost of throwing exceptions in .NET. In some

  • 0

This question is not about the cost of throwing exceptions in .NET. In some experiments a while back I saw a significant change in a method performance if it contained a throw statement somewhere in one of the execution paths, without actually ever using it. Does JIT somehow wraps any method that potentially could throw an exception in some extra code?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T16:42:14+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 4:42 pm

    Yes, there’s a difference. The x86 and x64 jitter optimizers will never inline a method that has a throw statement. The difference is hard to quantify because additional optimizations are possible after it got inlined, but typically a couple of nanoseconds per call.

    An optimization strategy used commonly in the .NET framework code is to put the statements that throw the exception in a helper method so that the common code path is still inlined. Visible in the Math.Abs() method for example:

    public static int Abs(int value)
    {
        if (value >= 0) return value;
        return AbsHelper(value);
    }
    
    private static int AbsHelper(int value)
    {
        if (value == int.MaxValue) throw new OverflowException(...);
        return -value;
    }
    

    Which ensures that the Abs() method itself is inlined and only negative values take the non-optimal code path.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Context: .NET 3.5, VS2008. I'm not sure about the title of this question, so
This question is NOT about race-conditions, atomicity, or why you should use locks in
This question is not about which is the best, it is about which makes
This question is not about 'best' barcode library recommendation, we use various products on
(NOTE: This question is not about escaping queries, it's about escaping results) I'm using
(note that this question is not about CAS, it's about the May fail spuriously
This is a question not really about programming (is not specific to any language
For starters, this question is not so much about programming in the NetBeans IDE
This question is about removing sequences from an array, not duplicates in the strict
Not much to say about this question...

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.