Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 607349
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T17:21:02+00:00 2026-05-13T17:21:02+00:00

This question is related to others I have asked on here, mainly regarding sorting

  • 0

This question is related to others I have asked on here, mainly regarding sorting huge sets of data in memory.

Basically this is what I want / have:

Twisted XMLRPC server running. This server keeps several (32) instances of Foo class in memory. Each Foo class contains a list bar (which will contain several million records). There is a service that retrieves data from a database, and passes it to the XMLRPC server. The data is basically a dictionary, with keys corresponding to each Foo instance, and values are a list of dictionaries, like so:

data = {'foo1':[{'k1':'v1', 'k2':'v2'}, {'k1':'v1', 'k2':'v2'}], 'foo2':...}

Each Foo instance is then passed the value corresponding to it’s key, and the Foo.bar dictionaries are updated and sorted.

class XMLRPCController(xmlrpc.XMLRPC):

    def __init__(self):
        ...
        self.foos = {'foo1':Foo(), 'foo2':Foo(), 'foo3':Foo()}
        ...

    def update(self, data):
        for k, v in data:
            threads.deferToThread(self.foos[k].processData, v)

    def getData(self, fookey):
        # return first 10 records of specified Foo.bar
        return self.foos[fookey].bar[0:10]

class Foo():

    def __init__(self):
        bar = []

    def processData(self, new_bar_data):
        for record in new_bar_data:
            # do processing, and add record, then sort
            # BUNCH OF PROCESSING CODE
            self.bar.sort(reverse=True)

The problem is that when the update function is called in the XMLRPCController with a lot of records (say 100K +) it stops responding to my getData calls until all 32 Foo instances have completed the process_data method. I thought deferToThread would work, but I think I am misunderstanding where the problem is.

Any suggestions… I am open to using something else, like Cherrypy if it supports this required behavior.


EDIT

@Troy: This is how the reactor is set up

reactor.listenTCP(port_no, server.Site(XMLRPCController)
reactor.run()

As far as GIL, would it be a viable option to change
sys.setcheckinterval()
value to something smaller, so the lock on the data is released so it can be read?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T17:21:03+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:21 pm

    The easiest way to get the app to be responsive is to break up the CPU-intensive processing in smaller chunks, while letting the twisted reactor run in between. For example by calling reactor.callLater(0, process_next_chunk) to advance to next chunk. Effectively implementing cooperative multitasking by yourself.

    Another way would be to use separate processes to do the work, then you will benefit from multiple cores. Take a look at Ampoule: https://launchpad.net/ampoule It provides an API similar to deferToThread.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This question is related to a previous post of mine Here . Basically, I
This question is similar to the one i asked here . But its related
This question is related to one I asked previously, see here . As a
This is slightly related to the question asked here yet the answer does not
This question is related to this other question I recently asked... cf.net exception and
This is related to a question I asked the other day on how to
This question is related to another question which I asked yesterday! List all links
This question is related to the question posted here: Why isn't my custom WCF
I have already asked this question on SuperUser but it was suggested there that
Related to a question I asked earlier here , I've found a problem which

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.