Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9129293
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T07:42:47+00:00 2026-06-17T07:42:47+00:00

This question seems simple, but I couldn’t find the proper place to set in

  • 0

This question seems simple, but I couldn’t find the proper place to set in a WSDL document a version to its definitions.

The objective is be able to easily see when it becomes outdated, when in the future I update it.

I’m gonna set it to 1.0. And if in the future I add a new operation to it, I set it to 1.1. Then if somebody has the 1.0 version it will be easy to see it’s missing that operation definition and request to update it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T07:42:49+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 7:42 am

    First thing to realise is that a new version of a service can be seen as a new service. Alike but different. The question then changes to “how to minimise duplication if services are similar”.

    As for versioning, you can use the namespace declaration (e.g. targetNamespace="mynamespace/1.0") or a <version>1.0</version> tag in (or version="1.0" attribute on) the root node of the types used for request/response messages).

    Using the namespace most likely means that one implementation can only serve one version of the service. If you want a certain implementation to serve, say, version 1.0-1.3 and another 1.3+, than you will likely use the <version/> method (or @version), since in that case there is only one namespace. Implementations can than internally decide wether to process or deny based on the value of <version/>.

    In a more hybrid service landscape, you can use the <version/> method to create a proxy implementation that relays to services that use the targetNamespace method. Better still would be using a UDDI for this, if you have one at your disposal.

    Please consider backwards compatibility of your changes. Adding an operation, as you suggest, is fully backwards compatible. If you have a client X on version 1.0, and add an operation to you server (now 1.1), X can still call the server because all the operations X knows about are still available. (Provided you did not change the namespace to reflect the version that is (use <version/>.) The (absence of) backward compatibility of an interface is usually reflected in a changed major version number (e.g. 1.1 -> 2.0), which may cause you to realize that you could do major changes with the namespace and minor ones with a <version/> tag.

    Have fun, this is interesting stuff to be working on!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a simple question really (but I couldn't seem to find the answer
this seems like a simple enough question but I can't seem to find a
This seems like a simple question, but has proven to be difficult to find
This seems like a fairly straightforward question, but I couldn't find this particular use-case
I couldn't find this question here although it seems simple. lets say that I
this seems like an obvious question to me, but I couldn't find it anywhere
This seems like a simple question, but it is difficult to search for. I
This seems to be an embarrassingly simple question, but, after a day of reading
This is a very simple question, but I can't seem to find something about
Although the question seems simple, I couldn't find the answer to it. I have

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.