Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8959495
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T15:27:14+00:00 2026-06-15T15:27:14+00:00

This should be really trivial but all the methods I came up with are

  • 0

This should be really trivial but all the methods I came up with are convoluted and waste operations (divide, take floor, scale up). Basically, I have random integers and I want to get the nearest 1000 multiple below it.

For example, if I have 6432, I really want 6000, or if I have 888 I want 0.

What the simplest expression that does this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T15:27:15+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 3:27 pm

    How about doing something like this:

    int OrigionalNum = 1503;
    int NewNum = (OrigionalNum / 1000) * 1000;
    

    It will give you an answer of 1 for 1503 / 1000, and then multiply it by 1000.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This should be really simple, but I have tried many solutions posted on the
This seems like it should be really simple, but I'm unable to figure this
This seems like it should be really easy but I couln't find an answer
This really should be easy, but I just can't work it out myself, the
This should really be allowed - I do not understand why it is not.
This should really be easy for an experienced android programmer. Unfortunately I don't know
This should be a really, really simple one, I would assume. I'm throwing together
Overview I am using CompositeWPF to create an app using C#. This really should
This might be something very straight forward and I really think it should work
Perhaps this question is trivial, but thinking a second time about it I wonder

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.