Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 249723
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T21:27:05+00:00 2026-05-11T21:27:05+00:00

This stackoverflow question has an interesting discussion on how to avoid giving enums and

  • 0

This stackoverflow question has an interesting discussion on how to avoid giving enums and properties the same names so that you don’t have code like this:

public SaveStatus SaveStatus { get; set; }

It seems the accepted answer suggested to use “State” for the enum and “Status” for the property:

public SaveStatus SaveState { get; set; }

But I think this is hard to read and not immediately clear what is what.

Since this enum naming problem is a constant issue, I am considering simply always suffixing my enums with “Enum” so I would have this:

public SaveStatusEnum SaveStatus { get; set; }

SaveStatus = SaveStatusEnum.Succeeded;

Does anyone do this? Happy with it? Solved this issue in another way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T21:27:05+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:27 pm

    From the MSDN page for Property naming guidelines:

    Consider creating a property with the same name as its underlying
    type. For example, if you declare a property named Color, the type of
    the property should likewise be Color.

    I’d take that as a “no” 🙂

    Edit:

    If you dislike using the fully qualified name inside the class that declares the property, you can work around it:

    using SaveStatusEnum = MyNamespace.SaveStatus;
    ...
    SaveStatus = SaveStatusEnum.SomeValue;
    

    That way you can keep the enum name without the suffix, and limit the naming oddity to just that one class. 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.