Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6016263
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T02:57:27+00:00 2026-05-23T02:57:27+00:00

this syntax was started quite some time ago, and I do not understand its

  • 0

this syntax was started quite some time ago, and I do not understand its appeal

to me, even with initialization,

var arr int[2]{ 1, 2 }  // wrong!

is more readable than

var arr [2]int{ 1, 2 }  // to me this seems klutzy

before more people get on my case, please see notes, and link in answer was exactly the info I was seeking.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T02:57:28+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 2:57 am

    The second way is more readable to me. It’s an opinion thing. Since you didn’t create the language, your opinion wasn’t the one adopted.

    There may have also been other factors, such as the second way being easier to parse.

    Here’s a blog post on the Go syntax choices. It sounds like it was mostly about readability.

    Also, this difference from C might play a part (found here):

    The size of an array is part of its
    type. The types [10]int and [20]int
    are distinct.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I just came over this syntax in some of the questions in this forum,
I can't quite figure out this syntax problem with a case expression in a
In SQL Server 2017, you can use this syntax, but not in earlier versions:
Each of these variables has an integer value. But this syntax is not valid
I am getting started with HTML and PHP. Doing alright, I understand the syntax
I have this syntax for grabbing some data from database, I using codeigniter's active
Whats this syntax useful for : function(String... args) Is this same as writing function(String[]
I've seen this syntax a couple times now, and it's beginning to worry me,
I have seen this syntax in MSDN: yield break , but I don't know
I have this syntax which works (since it's from the API, pretty much) <%

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.