Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 922327
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T19:00:41+00:00 2026-05-15T19:00:41+00:00

this time I got a more general question. Should I use multiple views rather

  • 0

this time I got a more general question. Should I use multiple views rather than stored procedures for weighted aggregation of data, if the original data is updated periodically?

Basically I have a local MySQL database that is updated periodically by importing the same kind of data (tables) from a bigger transaction database.

The local database is used for statistical analysis. Thus I de-normalize (basically aggregate) the data locally for use with statistical software packages. So far I used stored procedures because I felt it was easier to handle (and arranged more clearly) when weighting schemes (basically other tables containing weights that are multiplied with variables) came into play.

Though the disadvantage of stored procedures is that I have the run all of ’em again when the tables are populated with new data. Obviously I am not a DBA… So don´t shy away from stating the obvious 🙂 What´s the best approach to handle this kind of scenario? SP or views ? Or something completely different?

thx for any suggestions in advance!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T19:00:42+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 7:00 pm

    It depends (that’s the generic answer to any “general” questions, isn’t it? 🙂 ). You need to evaluate the tradeoffs to see what the best solution is for your needs.

    Views are basically just query re-writing (in MySQL), so using a view will be performing the aggregation/denormalization every time the query is run. That may make your queries slower that you would like. Also, if your procedures are really complicated, maybe it’s not practical to try to put that logic into a view.

    Stored procedures do the work once, so queries will be faster. But then your updates won’t show up automatically. So I think the answer depends on how often the data changes, how often queries are run, and how important the performance of the queries is.

    As for alternative suggestions, you could also run your stored procedures using events, if your data updates are regular, and you are just trying to save yourself from the manual task of running the procedures.

    Another option is to have denormalization/aggregation tables that are updated with triggers. As you update your data in the source table, the triggers will automatically keep the aggregate tables current.

    Here is a link to documentation for stored procedures, views, triggers, and events.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 452k
  • Answers 452k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Redirect the standard output to /dev/null: system("xcodebuild >/dev/null") == 0… May 15, 2026 at 9:10 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You need typename to use dependent types: typename signal_type::result_type getResult()… May 15, 2026 at 9:10 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This means postfix will only be used locally, so in… May 15, 2026 at 9:10 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.