Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3391612
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T03:49:21+00:00 2026-05-18T03:49:21+00:00

This was a fairly hard bug to find in my code but once i

  • 0

This was a fairly hard bug to find in my code but once i found it i was surprised the compiler didn’t catch it or understand why it was valid.

val my_string =
    "abc" +
    "def"
    "ghi"

The value of my_string ended up being "abcdef" since i missed the + sign after "def". Why didn’t the compiler complain and what happened to "ghi"?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T03:49:22+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 3:49 am

    The code is valid because "ghi" is a valid expression on its own.

    If this is inside a function (and not followed by anything else) then "ghi" is the return value of that function. Otherwise it’s just ignored (like if you’d written 42 + 23 on a line on its own).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a fairly involved bug, and I've tried looking around to find other
I'm sure this is fairly easy, but I've kind of had a hard time
This is a fairly trivial matter, but I'm curious to hear people's opinions on
While I understand this question is fairly vague since I'm not giving you all
This question may sound fairly elementary, but this is a debate I had with
I'm fairly new to C# but I will try to make this quick! ;)
This is going to be fairly hard to explain, so I've put together a
This is a fairly basic question, which for some reason, a proper solution escapes
Okay this is a fairly broad question. This is my first App and I'm
In postgres I am fairly sure you can do something like this SELECT authors.stage_name,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.