Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 361951
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T13:11:54+00:00 2026-05-12T13:11:54+00:00

This works: class MyClass { int a; public MyClass() { int b = a;

  • 0

This works:

class MyClass
{
    int a;

    public MyClass()
    {
        int b = a;
    }
}

But this gives a compiler error (“Use of unassigned local variable ‘a'”):

class MyClass
{
    public MyClass()
    {
        int a;
        int b = a;
    }
}

As far as I can tell this happens because in the first example, technically, the compiler doesn’t know that ‘a’ is not assigned. In the latter example, ‘a’ is defined locally, and therefore is easy to track.

But why does the latter example not work?

Don’t integers default to 0? Is this something the compiler enforces for “best practices”. Or is there another reason?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T13:11:54+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 1:11 pm

    In the first example it is a field. Fields automatically default to 0/false/null. In the second example it is a variable. Variables are not defaulted, and must have “definite assignment” before they are used.

    Essentially, when creating an object (or initializing a struct) it zeros the memory (or in the case of a non-default struct ctor, forces you to manually initialize everything). However, variables are so common (in every method) that it doesn’t want the overhead of having to zero the stack all the time. It instead forces you to indicate the initial value.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's suppose I have this object: [Serializable] public class MyClass { public int Age
This code works: class Test { public: Test(string name) : _name(name) {}; bool operator()()
public abstract class MyAbs implements Comparable<MyAbs> This would work but then I would be
Suppose I have a class: class MyClass { public int MyMethod(Func<int, int> f) {
Here is my code: template<typename T1, typename T2> class MyClass { public: template<int num>
I have a class setup like this public class MyCLass { //... public IList<MyInnerClass>
This works: class ButtonCountObserver { private var cnt = 0 // private field def
I´m dynamically creating an instance of a class with reflection and this works fine,
I need a class that works like this: >>> a=Foo() >>> b=Foo() >>> c=Foo()
I have this code which compiles and works as expected: class Right {}; class

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.