Title says it all: What is the difference between a UserTransaction and an EntityTransaction?
My rudimentary understanding is that UserTransaction is used when JTA is required (e.g. to do queries on mulitple things), and that EntityTransaction is used when JPA only is required (e.g. when the query is atomic).
Is that the only difference between the two or is there more to it than that?
That’s basically right, but your description of “multiple things” and “atomic” is a bit strange. JTA allows the developper to use distributed transaction to perform changes on multiples resources (database, JMS broker, etc.) atomically (all-or-nothing). If only one resource is accessed (e.g. one single database), you don’t need JTA, but the transaction is still atomic (all-or-nothing). That’s for instance the case when you use a regular JDBC transaction on one database.
Considering
UserTransactionvs.EntityTransaction:EntityTransactionto demarcate the transaction yourself.UserTransaction. TheEntityManagerhooks itself into the JTA distributed transaction manager. The only subtlety I’m aware of considers the flush of the changes. WhenEntityTransactionis used, JPA know it needs to flush the changes. If transaction are controlled usingUserTransaction, it needs to register a callback using JTAregisterSynchronization, so that the changes are flushed to the database before the transaction completes. If you use EJB with CMT (container managed transaction), you don’t even need to useUserTransaction: the app server starts and stops the transactions for you.Related questions: