Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7878631
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T03:42:49+00:00 2026-06-03T03:42:49+00:00

To create an empty sequence one uses the following var empty = Enumerable.Empty<string> ();

  • 0

To create an empty sequence one uses the following

var empty = Enumerable.Empty<string> ();

Is there an equivalent for creating an empty dictionary as easily as this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T03:42:51+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 3:42 am

    No there is no equivalent…

    The purpose of Enumerable.Empty<T>() is to return a “cached” instance of an empty array. So you can avoid the overhead of creating a new array (return new T[0];).

    You cannot translate this to a non-readonly structure like a IDictionary<TKey, TValue> or Dictionary<TKey, TValue> since the returned instance might be modified later and would therefore invalidate the purpose…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

How can I create an empty one-dimensional string array?
There are two different ways to create an empty object in JavaScript: var objectA
Is there an elegant way to create an empty jquery element (versus null) ?
I was wondering whether (and how) one can create empty c type arrays in
Consider this: #include <iostream> struct A{ A(){ std::cout << Create empty A << std::endl;
What is the most efficient way to create empty ListBuffer ? val l1 =
How can I create a empty .mdb file? I'm using ADO.NET and C#. Thanks!
I need to create an empty .mdb file, so that I can then run
How can I create an empty file at the DOS/Windows command-line? I tried: copy
I am unable to create an empty solution in Visual Studio. The msdn documentation

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.