Question

to program by contract or by interface, I define a class like this:

public ClsOne{
    private List<IntfA> fieldA;
    public setFieldA(List al);
}
public ClsA implements IntfA{...}

then in somewhere else, we can write:

....
ArrayList<ClsA> alist = new ArrayList<ClsA>();
ClsOne one = new ClsOne();
one.setFieldA(alist); 

But, this seems not available for embedded containers:

public ClsTwo{
    private List<List<IntfA>> fieldA;
    public setFieldA(List<List<IntfA>> al);
}
public ClsA implements IntfA{...}

since the code below is not correct:

ArrayList<ArrayList<ClsA>> aalist = new ArrayList<ArrayList<ClsA>>();
 ClsOne one = new ClsOne();
one.setFieldA(aalist);

So, is there any work around to hide concrete container type under this circumstance in ClsA’s definition?

Answer 1

You can instantiate an ArrayList which contains objects of type List<ClsA>:

ArrayList<List<ClsA>> aalist = new ArrayList<List<ClsA>>();
ClsOne one = new ClsOne();
one.setFieldA(aalist);