Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3303296
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T20:56:31+00:00 2026-05-17T20:56:31+00:00

Today i got a idea to make an ThreadQueue for C++, for my Server

  • 0

Today i got a idea to make an ThreadQueue for C++, for my Server Application.

 unsigned int m_Actives; // Count of active threads
 unsigned int m_Maximum;

 std::map<HANDLE, unsigned int> m_Queue;
 std::map<HANDLE, unsigned int>::iterator m_QueueIt;

In an extra Thread i would to handle these while:

 while(true)
 {
  if(m_Actives != m_Maximum)
  {
   if(m_Queue.size() > 0)
   {
    uintptr_t h = _beginthread((void(__cdecl*)(void*))m_QueueIt->first, 0, NULL);
    m_Actives++;
   }
   else
   {
    Sleep(100); // Little Cooldown, should it be higher? or lower?
   }
  }
 }

m_Maximum is setable and is the Maximal Thread Count. I think that should work, but now i need to Wait foreach Thread which is active and need to check if its finished/alive or not. But for this i would use WaitForSingleObject. But then i need 1 Thread per Thread. So 2 Threads. In the one something get handled. In the other one it wait for the 1 Thread to exit.

But i think that realy bad. What would you do?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T20:56:32+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 8:56 pm

    You can use WaitForMultipleObjects to wait while any of started threads is ended.

    Or, what is probably better in this case in each thread you can send an EVENT before stopping it. Than, the monitor thread should only wait and process this event.

    But, to be honest, your description and source is rather tricky….

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.