Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6182171
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T01:09:18+00:00 2026-05-24T01:09:18+00:00

Today I ran into a scenario where I have to create a method that

  • 0

Today I ran into a scenario where I have to create a method that share the same name, params count and params types with existent one, Something like this:

public static Department GetDepartment(string departmentName)
{
  //LOGIC
}

public static Department GetDepartment(string employeeID)
{
  //LOGIC
}

at first glance I just said why not to name it with a different name and get things done, but I couldn’t! I do want to maintain the readability of my code i’m working on, I want it to be overloaded to the first one,
so I said why not to add a fake parameter just to workaround this issue from the compiler Point of view.

 public static Department GetDepartment(string employeeID, object fakePassWtEver)
    {
      //LOGIC
    }

What is the best practice for this case? I see all the ways can let my code run, but none of them satisfied me

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T01:09:19+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 1:09 am

    Maintaining readability is precisely why you should rename it:

    Department GetDepartmentByName(...)
    
    Department GetDepartmentByEmployeeID(...)
    

    Now whenever you call the method, it’s absolutely obvious which one you mean. That’s very much not the case if you overload the method instead.

    I’ve become increasingly reluctant to overload over time – there are quite a few subtle issues, and readability very often goes down.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Today I ran into the following problem with NUnit. I have a class, that
I ran into an interesting dilemma today. I have a function that handles information
I ran into a problem today at work wherein I have a BindingGroup that
I ran into something odd today that maybe someone knows something about. I have
I ran into an interesting issue today. I have canvas elements that I am
today I ran into an error and have no clue how to fix it.
So odd situation that I ran into today with OrderBy: Func<SomeClass, int> orderByNumber =
I just started playing around with threading today and I ran into something that
I ran into a situation today where Java was not invoking the method I
I ran into this situation today. I have an object which I'm testing for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.