Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4047054
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T13:38:34+00:00 2026-05-20T13:38:34+00:00

today I tried to initialize an array of the sse type __m128d. Unfortunately it

  • 0

today I tried to initialize an array of the sse type __m128d. Unfortunately it didn’t work – why? Is it generally impossible to create arrays of sse types (since they are register types?). The following code segfaults at the assignment in the loop.

__m128d* _buffers = new __m128d[32];
for(int i=0;i<32;i++)
    _buffers[i] = _mm_setzero_pd();

Regards
+ Boom

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T13:38:34+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 1:38 pm

    You must use _mm_malloc() or _aligned_malloc(), depending on what’s the preferred function name on your compiler. __m128[di] in combination with new is almost always bad mojo.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Today I was working on a tab navigation for a webpage. I tried the
Today at work we came across the following code (some of you might recognize
Today I tried to download EGit plug-in from eclipse.org, and waited an hour and
Im have absolutely no experience with .htaccess and i tried something today. I basicly
Unfortunately my knowledge of NANT stuff is very limited but embarked today on updating
Today, I ran into this weird problem with a user using Mac OS X.
Today I was listening to the Hanselminutes show about .NET 3.5 SP1...What's inside ,
Today I discovered that my fresh installation of Apache HTTP Server is able to
Today I had a coworker suggest I refactor my code to use a label
Today I stumbled about a Problem which seems to be a bug in the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.