Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4055820
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T14:44:57+00:00 2026-05-20T14:44:57+00:00

Traditional physics simulation in games or graphics industry was basically discrete. But engines nowadays

  • 0

Traditional physics simulation in games or graphics industry was basically discrete.
But engines nowadays such as box2d or bullet3d implement continuous physics simulation. I know basic principles of discrete simulation, but I have no idea about continuous simulation. That’s magical to me, and using magic is hard and dangerous. So I want to make the magic into tools by understanding them.

So I want to know:
(1) What are the basic ideas and implementation principles of these continuous physics simulations? (2) Could the idea be generalized to other kind of discrete simulation? Please let me understand this!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T14:44:58+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 2:44 pm

    I know only what I’ve read in this document, which certainly has better information and better references than are worth simply repeating here.

    Nonetheless, it sounds like the collision detection is what’s continuous. Consider a bullet (coincidence?). If you simulate it with ∆t = 1/30 s, there’s a pretty high probability that it’ll be 5m in front of you at one timestep and 5m behind you at the next. From what I understand, a continuous physics engine would treat the bullet as a ray which intersects me precisely at the time that I die. It sounds like this method solves directly for when and where collisions will occur. I suspect the algebra for rotating and translating bodies gets complex, but if you really want to explore that, there seem to be some PhD theses referenced.

    I hope that’s not too obvious and condescending, but the document looks to have the relevant references. Good luck!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm currently learning traditional ASP.NET, but then there is a lot of buzz around
Assuming this as the traditional Dispose pattern (taken from devx but seen on many
In JavaScript I can assign onclick by traditional way: button.onclick = engineStop(); But how
In JavaScript I am filling array elements by traditional way, such as: myArray[12] =
Traditional task of iterating trough key set of std::map led me to another mess
In traditional ASP.NET (Web Forms), the UpdatePanel control lets you do a partial refresh
A traditional C++ class (just some random declarations) might resemble the following: class Foo
I have a traditional ASP.NET GridView. Inside of it I have a Template Field
In a traditional Windows shell, I can use net helpmsg to get the string-based
I noticed that I can't combine --traditional options with the other one letter other

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.