Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8784587
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T21:07:54+00:00 2026-06-13T21:07:54+00:00

Try-catch is meant to help in the exception handling. This means somehow that it

  • 0

Try-catch is meant to help in the exception handling. This means somehow that it will help our system to be more robust: try to recover from an unexpected event.

We suspect something might happen when executing and instruction (sending a message), so it gets enclosed in the try. If that something nearly unexpected happens, we can do something: we write the catch. I don’t think we called to just log the exception. I thing the catch block is meant to give us the opportunity of recovering from the error.

Now, let’s say we recover from the error because we could fix what was wrong. It could be super nice to do a re-try:

try{ some_instruction(); }
catch (NearlyUnexpectedException e){
   fix_the_problem();
   retry;
}

This would quickly fall in the eternal loop, but let’s say that the fix_the_problem returns true, then we retry. Given that there is no such thing in Java, how would YOU solve this problem? What would be your best design code for solving this?

This is like a philosophical question, given that I already know what I’m asking for is not directly supported by Java.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T21:07:55+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 9:07 pm

    You need to enclose your try-catch inside a while loop like this: –

    int count = 0;
    int maxTries = 3;
    while(true) {
        try {
            // Some Code
            // break out of loop, or return, on success
        } catch (SomeException e) {
            // handle exception
            if (++count == maxTries) throw e;
        }
    }
    

    I have taken count and maxTries to avoid running into an infinite loop, in case the exception keeps on occurring in your try block.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In a sort of try/catch form I want to execute a bash that doesn't
Can you try/catch a stack overflow exception in java? It seems to be throwing
I have a try catch and finally block like this. Client client = new
Why is this code correct: try { } catch(ArrayOutOfBoundsException e) {} and this wrong:
Ok this issue is driving me nutts, I thought that _id was meant to
Could you guys help me decypher unknown exception that is thrown by boost::iostreams::mapped_file_sink ?
I have a Try Catch in my code. I would like to know if
I have never used Try-catch in my code before, but now I need to
I know try catch have been discussed a lot but I haven’t found a
Is it possible to use TRY CATCH blocks in SQL Selects? For stuff similar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.