Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 937417
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T21:28:32+00:00 2026-05-15T21:28:32+00:00

try { if (isFileDownloaded) // do stuff else throw new CustomException() } catch (Exception

  • 0
try { 
  if (isFileDownloaded)
   // do stuff
  else
   throw new CustomException()
} 
catch (Exception e)
{
  // something went wrong to save the error to log
}
finally
{
  //release resources
}

My question is would the catch catches the ApplicationException thrown in the try block? is it in poor coding style?

Should it be written in another way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T21:28:33+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 9:28 pm

    The catch will catch your exception (and any other that occurs). That being said, I try to avoid writing code like this when possible.

    Personally, I see little reason to ever have exception handling (catch) for an exception thrown in the same scope. If you can handle your error in your method – put the exception handling (ie: logging) directly in the try block as well.

    Using a catch is more useful, IMO, for catching exceptions thrown by methods within your try block. This would be more useful, for example, if your // do stuff section happened to call a method that raised an exception.

    Also, I recommend not catching every exception (Exception e), but rather the specific types of exceptions you can handle correctly. The one exception to this would be if you’re rethrowing the exception within your catch – ie: using it for logging purposes but still letting it bubble up the call stack.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 499k
  • Answers 500k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is not pretty but it works: rm -R $(ls… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes. Override the base1 and base2 methods in Derived to… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No, you can't. Unfortunately, UIEvent doesn't expose any public way… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

Try loading this normal .jpg file in Internet Explorer 6.0. I get an error
try { ... } catch (SQLException sqle) { String theError = (sqle).getSQLState(); ... }
Try Dim ds As DataSet = SqlHelper.ExecuteDataset(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings(connstr).ConnectionString, CommandType.StoredProcedure, Get_All, New SqlParameter(@userid, Session(userid))) rptBundles.DataSource =
Try to write: List<Object> list; @SuppressWarnings(unchecked) list = (List<Object>) new Object(); It will fail
Try the following simple example: <html> <head> <style> div, input { border: 1px solid
Try recording a macro in Word 2007, notice you can't do a thing to
Try the following code public enum Color { Blue=1, Red=2, Green=3 } public List<Color>
Try executing the following in JavaScript: parseInt('01'); //equals 1 parseInt('02'); //equals 2 parseInt('03'); //equals
Try as I might, I can't get a RegEx to exclude space or single
i try this code in sql server 2005 declare @userName nvarchar(50) set @userName='איש2' print

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.