Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 365921
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T13:35:00+00:00 2026-05-12T13:35:00+00:00

Trying to use a reasonably long regex and it comes down to this small

  • 0

Trying to use a reasonably long regex and it comes down to this small section that doesn’t match how I’d expect it to.

>>> re.search(r'(foo)((?<==)bar)?', 'foo').groups()
('foo', None)

>>> re.search(r'(foo)((?<==)bar)?', 'foo=bar').groups()
('foo', None)

The first one is what I’m after, the second should be returning ('foo', 'bar').

I suspect I’m just misunderstanding how lookbehinds are meant to work, some some explanation would be great.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T13:35:00+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 1:35 pm

    The look behind target is never included in the match – it’s supposed to serve as an anchor, but not actually be consumed by the regex.

    The look behind pattern is only supposed to match if the current position is preceded by the target. In your case, after matching the “foo” in the string, the current position is at the “=”, which is not preceded by a “=” – it’s preceded by an “o”.

    Another way to see this is by looking at the re documentation and reading

    Note that patterns which start with positive lookbehind assertions will never match at the beginning of the string being searched;

    After you match the foo, your look behind is trying to match at the beginning of (the remainder of) the string – this will never work.

    Others have suggested regexes that may probably serve you better, but I think you’re probably looking for

    >>> re.search('(foo)(=(bar))?', 'foo=bar').groups()
    ('foo', '=bar', 'bar')
    

    If you find the extra group is a little annoying, you could omit the inner “()”s and just chop the first character off the matched group…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 240k
  • Answers 240k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would try it using the $.post method vs. the… May 13, 2026 at 7:17 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Two things to do 1. Pop over into the plugin… May 13, 2026 at 7:17 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can trigger the event by calling change() directly: $("#Country").val($("#PrimaryCountryId").val()).change() May 13, 2026 at 7:17 am

Related Questions

The ASP.NET web app project I'm currently working on is getting slower over time
I've just signed up to a site to purchase some goods, and when I
I'm implementing a small application in C, which I would like to sell as
I am going to be starting a new job soon and the company has

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.