Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7669821
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T15:40:55+00:00 2026-05-31T15:40:55+00:00

# type foo = Foo of int * int # let t = (1,

  • 0
# type foo = Foo of int * int
# let t = (1, 2)
# Foo t
Error: The constructor Foo expects 2 argument(s),
   but is applied here to 1 argument(s)

How is it that I must do Foo (1, 2) to avoid that error even t has the appropriate type?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T15:40:56+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 3:40 pm

    This is one of the troubling parts of OCaml syntax, in my opinion. Despite the way it looks, the constructor Foo doesn’t require a 2-tuple as its argument. It requires, syntactically, two values in parentheses–but they aren’t a tuple. So it’s simply the case that t has the wrong type. The way to make this work is to say:

    let (a, b) = t in Foo (a, b)
    

    The problem really is that parentheses are being used for two different things (or so I claim). Once you get used to this it’s not so difficult to deal with.

    Edit: if you want the constructor Foo to take a single tuple, rather than two separate values, you can define it like this:

    type foo = Foo of (int * int)
    

    Then the rest of your original code will work.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have my own type: CREATE TYPE MyType AS TABLE ( foo INT )
Given a variable foo of type FooClass* and a member variable in that class
The following code yields an error error: ‘struct Foo’ is not a valid type
Let say I have a WCF Foo(int param); The client is passing in a
Let's say I have a variadic function foo(int tmp, ...) , when calling foo
Let's say I have the following code: public class Foo { private int x;
Let's say Foo has 2 overloads: void Foo(int[] array) { ... } void Foo(int[,]
Let me explain with an example - #include <iostream> void foo( int a[2], int
Is it possible to take a record like: type Foo = { Bar: int
Can't define (?) operator overload on type: type Foo = val s : string

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.