Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 901189
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T15:31:01+00:00 2026-05-15T15:31:01+00:00

typedef struct foo { bool my_bool; int my_int; } foo; In the example above

  • 0
typedef struct foo
{
    bool my_bool;
    int my_int;
} foo;

In the example above I understand that my_bool will be initialized randomly to either true or false but what about my_int? I assumed that my_int would be default initialized to 0 but that seems not to be the case.

Defining structs in this way appears to be incompatible with initialization lists so what is the best way to initialize my_bool and my_int to false and 0 respectively?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T15:31:01+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 3:31 pm

    Types don’t get “initialized”. Only objects of some type get initialized. How and when they get initialized depends on how and where the corresponding object is defined. You provided no definition of any object in your question, so your question by itself doesn’t really make much sense – it lacks necessary context.

    For example, if you define a static object of type foo

    static foo foo_object; // zeros
    

    it will be automatically zero-initialized because all objects with static duration are always automatically zero-initialized.

    If you define an automatic object of type foo without an initializer, it will remain uninitialized

    void func()
    {
       foo foo_object; // garbage
    }
    

    If you define an automatic object of type foo with an aggregate initializer, it will be initialized in accordance with that initializer

    void func()
    {
       foo foo_object1 = { 1, 2 }; // initialized
       foo foo_object2 = {}; // initialized with zeros
    }
    

    If you allocate your object with new and provide no initializer, it will remain uninitialized

    foo *p = new foo; // garbage in `*p`
    

    But if you use the () initializer, it will be zero-initialzed

    foo *p = new foo(); // zeros in `*p`
    

    If you create a temporary object of type foo using the foo() expression, the result of that expression will be zero-initialized

    bool b = foo().my_bool; // zero
    int i = foo().my_int; // zero
    

    So, once again, in your specific case the initialization details depend on now you create the object of your type, not on your type itself. Your type itself has no inherent initialization facilities and doesn’t interfere with the initialization in any way.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 438k
  • Answers 438k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If someone says "This algorithm runs in O(n) time", he's… May 15, 2026 at 4:44 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer A class can only access protected members of instances of… May 15, 2026 at 4:44 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There's the Stack<T> class, which is pretty much the purest… May 15, 2026 at 4:44 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.