Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8185195
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T01:45:46+00:00 2026-06-07T01:45:46+00:00

Typically in a case where jQuery fails to find matching elements using its selector

  • 0

Typically in a case where jQuery fails to find matching elements using its selector the default value is never an exception but rather a lack of action.

My understanding is this is done by design to ensure that the lack of an element does not result in an error condition. However I have found that jQuery.val() does not exhibit this same behaviour. If a selected element does not exist jQuery.val() will return undefined rather than an empty string (which in keeping with the remainder of the framework I would have expected).

So why is jQuery.val() an exception to the rest of the framework and what would be the best way to change this behaviour?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T01:45:48+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 1:45 am

    The key here is chainability of jQuery methods. A jQuery method doesn’t return undefined when a selector doesn’t match anything because it would break the chain. Consider:

    $( '#doesntExist' ).addClass( 'foo' ).fadeIn();
    

    If the selector that doesn’t match anything would return undefined it would break the chain since undefined doesn’t have any methods of its own. Now every method is executed (and do nothing) whether or not the element is found.

    .val() on the other hand is different since it’s purpose is to return the value of an element. It doesn’t chain at all unlike many other jQuery methods, because a method has to return a jQuery object for it to be able to chain. For example, $( '#foo' ).val().addClass( 'bar' ) does not work regardless of whether the element #foo exists or not.

    In this light having .val() return an empty string would not make it any more in line with chainable methods, since no other method returns an empty string when the element isn’t found either, and returning undefined does not break chainability since the method doesn’t chain in the first place.

    (By the way, the same is true for every method that returns a value, like .css() and .data().)

    Usually it’s more useful to know whether the value of an element is empty or whether the element doesn’t exist at all, but if you prefer to always get a string back you can add a method of your own:

    $.fn.stringVal = function() {
        return( this.val() || '' );
    };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have to use a value, typically return via a method in switch case.
I am using jQuery dialog in a simple, typical use case: In the Javascript:
I typically do not develop client-side (in this case, mobile) code, so my apologies
Typically you start a service like this Intent i = new Intent(context,MessageService.class); context.startService(i); but
Typically in Django I can find out what queries are being run against the
I have a form that is using jQuery Validate plugin for client side validation,
It looks like good JSON objects typically have a name-value pair, with value being
I am using the camera in a fax type iOS application in which case
I have read a lot about preventing race conditions, but typically with one record
I know when you request a page normally it is typically the case that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.